1 |
Are you from |
|
62 |
|
ac |
76% |
47 |
|
ind |
10% |
6 |
|
sys |
3% |
2 |
|
tools |
3% |
2 |
|
both |
8% |
5 |
|
other |
0% |
0 |
General Event |
|
|
|
2 |
How did you learn about the event? |
|
61 |
|
attended previous conference |
28% |
17 |
|
email information |
34% |
21 |
|
ECRTS webpage |
21% |
13 |
|
other |
16% |
10 |
3 |
How did you find the information provided wrt logistics, i.e., location, hotels, etc |
|
56 |
|
sufficient |
91% |
51 |
|
lacking, |
9% |
5 |
4 |
How did you find the organization of the whole event |
|
55 |
|
excellent |
56% |
31 |
|
good |
38% |
21 |
|
sufficient |
5% |
3 |
|
lacking |
0% |
0 |
5 |
How do you find the conference dates, i.e., first week of July |
|
56 |
|
good in general |
77% |
43 |
|
good in this year |
16% |
9 |
|
problematic, why |
7% |
4 |
|
your proposed dates |
|
|
6 |
Which topics would you like to see covered? |
|
|
7 |
Why do you attend the event (multiple nominations if needed)? |
|
122 |
|
technical program |
|
22 |
|
I am author |
|
36 |
|
satellite events |
|
29 |
|
invited talks |
|
5 |
|
meeting researchers |
|
30 |
8 |
Would you like to have tutorials |
|
45 |
|
yes |
18% |
8 |
|
no |
82% |
37 |
9 |
Would you like to have a panel? |
|
48 |
|
yes |
27% |
13 |
|
no |
78% |
35 |
10 |
Where do you primarily publish your papers |
|
|
|
ECRTS |
|
28 |
|
RTSS |
|
19 |
|
RTAS |
|
8 |
|
RTCSA |
|
5 |
|
ISORC |
|
2 |
|
WORDS |
|
1 |
|
EMSOFT |
|
2 |
|
other |
|
16 |
11 |
What is your personal ranking of conferences |
|
|
|
ECRTS |
|
1.88 |
|
RTSS |
|
1.42 |
|
RTAS |
|
2.47 |
|
RTCSA |
|
4.00 |
|
ISORC |
|
3.80 |
|
WORDS |
|
4.33 |
|
EMSOFT |
|
3.14 |
|
other |
|
1.40 |
12 |
Do you plan on attending again |
|
56 |
|
yes |
93% |
52 |
|
no |
7% |
4 |
13 |
other commens |
|
|
Satellite workshops |
|
|
|
14 |
Which topics would you like to have a satellite workshop on |
|
|
15 |
Would you prefer in the workshops |
|
29 |
|
more paper presentations |
10% |
3 |
|
more discussions |
66% |
19 |
|
more invited papers/tutorials |
21% |
6 |
|
other |
3% |
1 |
16 |
Which workshop did you attend |
|
40 |
|
CERTS |
8% |
3 |
|
ARTOSS |
8% |
3 |
|
SLAP |
28% |
11 |
|
RTLIA |
28% |
11 |
|
WCET |
30% |
12 |
17 |
Did the workshop fulfil your expectations? |
|
38 |
|
yes |
92% |
35 |
|
no |
8% |
3 |
18 |
Do you find the workshop relevant |
|
37 |
|
yes |
100% |
37 |
|
no |
0% |
0 |
19 |
Did you like the format of the workshop you attended? |
|
37 |
|
yes |
89% |
33 |
|
no |
11% |
4 |
20 |
What did you find good? |
|
|
21 |
What did you find not good/miss? |
|
|
22 |
In order to attend the workshop, contributions/papers |
|
35 |
|
have to be included in formal published proceedings |
60% |
21 |
|
should be included in hand outs to workshop participants only |
17% |
6 |
|
™ not important |
23% |
8 |
23 |
Your interest in the workshop; Do you plan to attend the workshop |
|
|
|
this time only |
|
|
|
regular basis |
|
|
24 |
How do you find the quality of the technical program of the workshop you attended (1 – 5, 1 highest)? |
|
2.07 |
25 |
Were the selection procedures for the technical program clear to you |
|
34 |
|
yes |
85% |
29 |
|
no |
15% |
5 |
26 |
other commens |
|
|
Main conference |
|
|
|
27 |
How do you find the quality of the technical program of the workshop you attended (1 – 5, 1 highest)? |
|
1.82 |
28 |
Were the selection procedures for the technical program clear to you |
|
36 |
|
yes |
86% |
31 |
|
no |
14% |
5 |
29 |
Which paper did you like best |
|
|
30 |
Which pres did you like best |
|
|
31 |
Please rate each invited talk (1-5, 1 highest) |
|
|
|
Kostas Glinos |
|
2.34 |
|
Sjir van Loo |
|
1.93 |
|
Paul Caspi |
|
3.00 |
32 |
other commens |
|
|
Work in progress session |
|
|
|
33 |
How do you find the quality of the technical program of the workshop you attended (1 – 5, 1 highest)? |
|
2.14 |
34 |
Did you like the poster session |
|
27 |
|
yes |
100% |
27 |
|
no |
0% |
0 |
35 |
Did you like the session format |
|
27 |
|
yes |
96% |
26 |
|
no |
4% |
1 |
36 |
Were the selection procedures for the technical program clear to you |
|
24 |
|
yes |
92% |
22 |
|
no |
8% |
2 |
37 |
other commens |
|
|