Results questionaire ECRTS 03

 
1 Are you from
62

ac 76% 47

ind 10% 6

sys 3% 2

tools 3% 2

both 8% 5

other 0% 0
General Event


2 How did you learn about the event?
61

attended previous conference 28% 17

email information 34% 21

ECRTS webpage 21% 13

other 16% 10
3 How did you find the information provided wrt logistics, i.e., location, hotels, etc
56

sufficient 91% 51

lacking, 9% 5
4 How did you find the organization of the whole event
55

excellent 56% 31

good 38% 21

sufficient 5% 3

lacking 0% 0
5 How do you find the conference dates, i.e., first week of July
56

good in general 77% 43

good in this year 16% 9

problematic, why 7% 4

your proposed dates

6 Which topics would you like to see covered?

7 Why do you attend the event (multiple nominations if needed)?
122

technical program
22

I am author
36

satellite events
29

invited talks
5

meeting researchers
30
8 Would you like to have tutorials
45

yes 18% 8

no 82% 37
9 Would you like to have a panel?
48

yes 27% 13

no 78% 35
10 Where do you primarily publish your papers


ECRTS
28

RTSS
19

RTAS
8

RTCSA
5

ISORC
2

WORDS
1

EMSOFT
2

other
16
11 What is your personal ranking of conferences


ECRTS
1.88

RTSS
1.42

RTAS
2.47

RTCSA
4.00

ISORC
3.80

WORDS
4.33

EMSOFT
3.14

other
1.40
12 Do you plan on attending again
56

yes 93% 52

no 7% 4
13 other commens

Satellite workshops


14 Which topics would you like to have a satellite workshop on

15 Would you prefer in the workshops
29

more paper presentations 10% 3

more discussions 66% 19

more invited papers/tutorials 21% 6

other 3% 1
16 Which workshop did you attend
40

CERTS 8% 3

ARTOSS 8% 3

SLAP 28% 11

RTLIA 28% 11

WCET 30% 12
17 Did the workshop fulfil your expectations?
38

yes 92% 35

no 8% 3
18 Do you find the workshop relevant
37

yes 100% 37

no 0% 0
19 Did you like the format of the workshop you attended?
37

yes 89% 33

no 11% 4
20 What did you find good?

21 What did you find not good/miss?

22 In order to attend the workshop, contributions/papers
35

have to be included in formal published proceedings 60% 21

should be included in hand outs to workshop participants only 17% 6

™ not important 23% 8
23 Your interest in the workshop; Do you plan to attend the workshop


this time only


regular basis

24 How do you find the quality of the technical program of the workshop you attended (1 – 5, 1 highest)?
2.07
25 Were the selection procedures for the technical program clear to you
34

yes 85% 29

no 15% 5
26 other commens

Main conference


27 How do you find the quality of the technical program of the workshop you attended (1 – 5, 1 highest)?
1.82
28 Were the selection procedures for the technical program clear to you
36

yes 86% 31

no 14% 5
29 Which paper did you like best

30 Which pres did you like best

31 Please rate each invited talk (1-5, 1 highest)


Kostas Glinos
2.34

Sjir van Loo
1.93

Paul Caspi
3.00
32 other commens

Work in progress session


33 How do you find the quality of the technical program of the workshop you attended (1 – 5, 1 highest)?
2.14
34 Did you like the poster session
27

yes 100% 27

no 0% 0
35 Did you like the session format
27

yes 96% 26

no 4% 1
36 Were the selection procedures for the technical program clear to you
24

yes 92% 22

no 8% 2
37 other commens